Approval of the withdrawal
Item 3 approved the withdrawal of the complaint proceeding and private accusation filed against Noel Arturo Manzano Chirinos and other individuals.
Verifiable documentary reference
Ruling No. 0094: approval of the withdrawal and lifting of precautionary measures
A precise summary of the outcome documented by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice on April 25, 2019.
Documented outcome
The Chamber approved the withdrawal of the complaint proceeding and private accusation that included Noel Arturo Manzano Chirinos, and lifted the precautionary measures ordered in case 23J-1191-18.
Identification
Judicial record
- Court
- Supreme Court of Justice
- Chamber
- Constitutional Chamber
- Ruling
- No. 0094
- Date
- April 25, 2019
- Case file
- 18-0742
- Related case
- 23J-1191-18
Copy integrity: SHA-256 c0f8553be589470bb52c7be66497daaa2e054ef983376a4e49324038320fd9b4
Procedural sequence
Documented timeline
Precautionary measures
Measures were ordered in case 23J-1191-18 and were later identified and lifted by Ruling No. 0094.
Decision No. 0806
The Constitutional Chamber declared itself competent and assumed jurisdiction over the case.
Withdrawals filed
Written withdrawals of the request for assumption of jurisdiction, complaint and private accusation were filed, as described in the ruling.
Ruling No. 0094
The Chamber approved the applicable withdrawals, lifted the precautionary measures and directed the corresponding institutional notifications.
Operative section
Orders related to Noel Arturo Manzano Chirinos
Lifting of precautionary measures
Item 4 lifted the measures ordered on May 30, 2018, including the freezing of accounts, restrictions on transferring or encumbering property and the travel restriction.
Notifications ordered
The Chamber directed that a certified copy be sent to SAREN, SAIME and SUDEBAN to notify them that the measures had been lifted.
Source: the operative section of Ruling No. 0094. This summary preserves the terms used in the ruling and does not replace the complete document.
Scope
Frequently asked questions
What was the documented outcome?
The Chamber approved the withdrawal of the complaint proceeding and private accusation and lifted the precautionary measures identified in the ruling.
Is Ruling No. 0094 an acquittal?
No. The operative section does not contain an acquittal. The result should be described in its precise terms: approval of the withdrawal and lifting of precautionary measures.
Does this prove that every related proceeding was dismissed?
No, not from this ruling alone. Ruling No. 0094 supports the orders contained in its operative section and should not automatically be extended to different case files.
Where can the information be verified?
Through the Supreme Court of Justice historical publication and the complete copy of the ruling available on this page.
Editorial standard
Documentary transparency
This page distinguishes earlier procedural acts from the result expressly stated in the ruling. It does not present allegations as proven facts or use legal characterizations absent from the operative section.
For informational purposes only. This is not legal advice. Last updated September 11, 2026.